Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Gabriella Theisen
The First Book of Macabees

The overall portrayal of the story clearly reveals the first book of the Maccabees to have been written by a Jew. The narrator is extremely traumatized by the events that took place, and he feels extremely invested in the temple and the Jewish people‘s plight and survival, for example, “ The very earth was shaken over its inhabitants, and the whole household of Jacob was covered with shame.” (line 46.The Apocrypha,378.) The narrator refers to Jewish texts and Jewish historical knowledge, and the sophisticated, persuasive description of the story seems to show the narrator to have held some level of status.
The first Book of Maccabees presents a brief historical description of the events that took place leading up to the destruction of temples, and the Israelite’s heroic fighting. The book also provides a vivid description of what happened through the lens of a person who is Jewish, and seems to want teach others about what happened, the importance of supporting the Jewish people under the Jewish God.
Historically, Antiochus III upheld Seleucid rule over Palestine with a similar governmental and traditional system as those held during the Ptolemaic period. Persian Judea maintained it’s own government and religious system, in fact Antiochus granted Judea certain financial pardons. Great changes in domestic policy however, came after Antiochus III lost in battle against Rome. As a result, the Seleucids faced extremely high debts to the Roman Republic, a financial burden that greatly altered the Seleucid’s relations with the Jewish community. During this period, the Seleucids did not care to destroy the Jewish religion, but had no qualms pillaging wealthy ancient synagogues to make money. The first section, in the First Book of Maccabees depicts the historical turning point after the death of Alexander “ He mustered a very mighty army and ruled over the lands and rulers of the heathen, and they paid him tribute.” (line 5,6. The Apocrypha. 375) The author’s description of Alexander as a mighty ruler makes sense; Under the rule of Alexander, the Judeans practiced their own traditions in a political environment that supported cohesion among different peoples (this however, becomes a problem later on)
The period of warfare and bloodshed documented after Alexander’s death is written here, “ his servants succeeded him…..for many years, and they did much evil on the earth” (line 9, The Acrophobia, 375.) Jewish political activity proceeding the Hasmonean Revolt focused primarily on maintain Jewish autonomy. The story reflects this ethnocentric mentality upheld by many Judeans. The story might even be viewed as a moral lesson, calling for Jews to follow the “Law.” In the second paragraph, the author describes “lawless men” who came out of Israel wanting to assimilate with the “heathen” in pursuit of an easier and safer life. As the story unfolds, those who assimilated became “slaves of wrongdoing” (The Acrophobia, 376) people who took part in desecrating the temple and committing disgusting atrocities against the Judeans. These actions stand in great contrast to characters like Mattathias, and his son Judas, as well as the other Israelites that died for the Jewish cult. Mattathias makes profound statements in the story, where he declares that he would never let the king forsake the religion of his forefathers. The persona given to the both characters, and to the Israelites as a whole not only make for heroes in the story, but also promote strong will. For Jews during the period the story was redacted, faith and personal strength was crucial for Jewish autonomy. Part of why the author might have written this story so vividly, might have served as a piece to inspire Jews to stay on the religion.
It is also extremely interesting how the author does not mention much about the Judean God directly. Instead, the author quotes Mattitius or Judas refusing to abandon the “Law.” The author never goes into detail about what the “Law” stands for exactly, rather it is a vague symbol of the Jewish God. The “Law” is characterized to be supported by God, seen for example, how the few Israelites are able to take on the entire Antiochus’ and the Roman armies. The First Book of Maccabees serves many purposes, and it is hard to tell whether it was written shortly after the events at hand, or if it was much later. At time that religion was often based on citizenship, or kingdom rule, the story functions most profoundly in how it stands as a strong record that aims to prove that the Jewish cult is the true religion under God.

1 comment:

lospielman said...

achel Hilker - Ancient Jewish History - 10/3/06
Assignment 1 - I & II Maccabees
The books of I and II Maccabees give a noticeably biased description of the events that followed the death of Alexander the Great. The sections of the books that we have read focus on the reign Antiochus Ephiphanes and Judas Maccabeus’ response to it, as well as certain events from the decades preceding the reign of Antiochus, providing background for the reader. Both sections are written as histories as well as theological statements, promoting the concepts of martyrdom and heroism and condemning the assimilationist attitudes of many of the Jews of the period.
The first book is largely focused on the actions taken by Mattathias and his son Judas, called Maccabeus. From the beginning, Antiochus is referred to as a “sinful shoot” (v. 10) and the portrayal throughout the chapter of his actions supports this description. Antiochus comes to the throne in the “one-hundred and thirty-seventh year of the Greek Kingdom” (v. 12-13) which was approximately 175 B.C.E. After making treaties with the Jews and trying to Hellenize them, he attacks them, ruining their alters and massacring people. Once he does this he sends officers to collect taxes from the people, who actually ransack Jerusalem once again, bringing the city to despair.
It is interesting that Antiochus spent so much energy on Jerusalem, which was such a small part of his kingdom. We have to ask ourselves why he would have entered Jerusalem with such a “strong force” (v. 21) or if this was an exaggeration on the part of the author. Also, what was the impetus for the abrupt switch from peaceful treaties to forceful assimilation? It is impossible to know from the text at this point and the from this point forward in this book we only hear mention of the forceful actions of Antiochus and his armies as well as the violent retaliation from Mattathias.
Mattathias is angered by the actions of Antiochus and vows that his family will not succumb to the desire for the Jews to take on Greek customs. We are informed from the text that some of the Jews are assimilating and sacrificing in the Greek tradition, but we also know that there is some value to the idea of martyrdom. Mattathias and his family as well as the others who escape into the wilderness and are killed on Shabbat for not raising defense against their attackers are glorified in this book for their choice to become martyrs rather than save themselves by conforming to the wishes of the King. Interestingly enough, the over-exalted martyrdom of the Hasmoneans and the other escapees of Jerusalem is truly a concept influenced by external sources.
Martyrdom is not a Jewish concept and is obviously evidence of the impact of other cultures on the Jewish people of the era.
II Maccabees, written by a historian more interested in the history of the period rather than the heroism of the family of Mattathias, gives background into the period before the reign of Antiochus, but not without his own bias. We are informed that Simon, governor of the Temple, had an argument with the well-reputed high priest Onias and angrily notified the Seleucid government of large sums of money unaccounted for in the Temple treasury. This resulted in the Seleucid messenger Heliodotus coming to Jerusalem, learning of Simon’s lie, and falling ill due to a vision of angels. Simon’s troublemaking resulted in long-term effects and there peace in the area was a difficult task.
The text then gives us information about Jason, the “excessively wicked” and “godless” high priest (verse 13) who built a gymnasium in the Greek fashion and encouraged the people to assimilate. As an answer to the question, “why did Antiochus expend so much force to destroy Jerusalem?” we find in chapter two that Jason was really the cause. After hearing a rumor of Antiochus’ death, Jason attacked the city. Seeing this as a revolt, Antiochus sent his army down in full force to subdue the people, causing all of the destruction described in chapter one. Finally, this section ends with the second description of Judas Maccabeus fleeing with his brothers into the wilderness and with the warning to the reader that these events occurred to the Jewish people because God wanted to correct them of their evil ways - one of the more theological statements of the chapter.
The second book is less of a statement about the people who were living in Palestine at the time and more of a history explaining why the people were so eager to assimilate. From the first book, the Jews are portrayed as fickle people who follow the crowd and the Maccabees are exalted for their bravery in martyrdom. However, from the second book, we can see that the Jews feared for their lives and that much of the destruction caused by the Greek government was due to a few people within the Jewish hierarchy. While both books have their own bias, the first toward those who risked their lives to follow the Jewish law, the second against the specific leaders mentioned, the first book is much more of an epic about the goals of the Hasmoneans while the second is a history describing the events that occurred before and after their revolt.